KUN-QIKUN-QI SMT. CO.
CORE PROCESSING SERVICE 01 / SUS MICRO TREATMENT

SMT stainless steel.
Precision surface treatment.

Stainless steel micro surface treatment for your components. Send us your requirements for assessment and a quotation, from samples to batch production.

View the test evidence ↓
Test Results from fem, GermanyAfter SMT Treatment · 1 μm scale barSelect to view full image
Test electron micrograph · Original scale bar preserved
01 / THE SURFACE IN FOCUS

Surface requirements.
Component-led assessment.

KUN-QI provides SMT stainless steel micro surface treatment, focusing on surface structure, smoothness and cleanliness. Enquiries may concern precision components with holes, threads, internal walls, flat or curved surfaces. Medical instruments and industrial components with roughness, cleanliness or corrosion-resistance requirements are assessed against their material, geometry and intended use. The microscopy and test records below support that assessment; suitability is reviewed for each component.

Surface structureRoughnessCleanabilityReduced bacterial adhesion
The brand uses SUS Micro Treatment; the German test documents use the term Surface-Micro-Treatment.
02 / MICROSCOPY

Change the scale.
Keep every detail.

Two treated-surface images. Two viewing scales.
The original scale bars and instrument information remain intact.

Test Results from fem, GermanyAfter SMT Treatment · 1 μm scale barSelect to view full image
Test Results from fem, GermanyAfter SMT Treatment · 10 μm scale barSelect to view full image
1 μm and 10 μm label the image scale bars, not surface roughness values.
01 / THE FINER VIEW

At a 1 μm scale.
A closer surface view.

The detailed image records local surface morphology. The original scale bar, detector, working distance, accelerating voltage and date remain visible at the bottom.

02 / THE WIDER VIEW

At a 10 μm scale.
A wider field of view.

The wider image adds context to the surface observation. Both images show SMT-treated surfaces: they are not a before-and-after pair and should not be compared without considering their scale bars.

Additional observation: Before Treatment, 20 μm scale bar
Electron micrograph of an untreated surface, with the original 20 micrometre scale bar at the upper left
This image uses a different scale. It is presented independently, not as a matched-magnification comparison.
03 / ROUGHNESS MEASUREMENT

Ra Surface Roughness Measurements

The fem profilometry report records three Ra readings of 0.02 μm for the SMT-treated component, with a mean of 0.02 μm, equivalent to 20 nm.

Mean valueRa 0.02 μm

(20 nm)

RA / ORIGINAL MEASUREMENT VALUES

Test Results from fem, Germany

Ra unit: μm

SMT-treated component | Ra Surface Roughness Measurements
Report specimenReading 1Reading 2Reading 3Mean
SMT-treated component0.020.020.020.02

Readings and the mean retain the precision shown in the report. The SMT-treated component has a mean Ra of 0.02 μm, equivalent to 20 nm.

Measuring length
LM 1.25 mm / LT 1.75 mm
Profile filter notation
R [LC GS 0.25 mm]
Stylus
MFW-250 CAL
SURFACE PERFORMANCE / CORROSION

Test Results from fem, Germany

NSS salt-spray testing: photographic records of stainless steel specimens at 500 h and 1000 h.

NSS Corrosion Testing and Oxidation Observations

Examine the post-oxidation surface with the original electron micrographs and their respective test conditions.

NSS Salt-Spray Test | SMT-treated components

Test Results from fem, Germany

The SMT-treated stainless steel components are shown before exposure, after 500 hours and after 1000 hours. The original specimen appearance and exposure-time markers are retained.

Before salt-spray exposure
Before salt-spray exposureNSS / INITIAL
After 500 h NSS
After 500 h NSSNSS / 500 h
After 1000 h NSS
After 1000 h NSSNSS / 1000 h

These are photographic records at the stated NSS exposure times; the photographs alone do not specify a corrosion rating or pass/fail assessment.

High-Temperature Oxidation | Microscopy

Post-oxidation micrograph of untreated steel with the original 20 micrometre scale bar
Before Treatment950°C / O₂Oxygen oxidation conditions · Original 20 μm scale bar
Post-oxidation micrograph of SMT-treated steel retaining original contour annotations and 20 micrometre scale bar
After SMT Treatment900°C / ArH₂–H₂OOxidation atmosphere as recorded · Original 20 μm scale bar

Oxidation conditions: untreated surface, 950°C / O₂; SMT-treated surface, 900°C / ArH₂–H₂O. Atmosphere, temperature and instrument magnification differ; these are not matched-condition comparison images.

SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS / EASY TO CLEAN

The lotus-effect perspective.
A closer look at cleanability.

The lotus effect is presented here as a natural example of how microscopic surface structure can influence water and surface interactions. It provides a conceptual introduction to surface structure, adhesion and cleanability.

Surface smoothnessAdhesion behaviourCleanability

This natural example does not establish that SMT-treated surfaces are necessarily superhydrophobic or have the same water-droplet contact angle as a lotus leaf. Contact-angle and roll-off-angle data have not been provided; the concept image and micrographs do not substitute for wetting measurements.

Return to the original micrographs ↗
AI-generated concept illustration of rounded water droplets on a green lotus leaf
Lotus-effect concept illustration (AI-generated); not an SMT component test photograph.
04 / BACTERIAL ADHESION

Bacterial Retention Testing: Labor Dr. Gärtner, Ravensburg, Germany

A smoother surface.
Less opportunity for bacteria to adhere.

SMT surface micro-treatment reduces opportunities for bacterial adhesion. In this MRSA test, the SMT-treated panel retained fewer colonies after the specified wiping procedure than the untreated and electropolished panels.

Test procedure summary
  1. Panels were cleaned, sealed and autoclaved.
  2. Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was used; the documented starting count was 5.7 × 10⁸ CFU.
  3. 100 μl of suspension was applied; panels were positioned at a defined angle and left for 30 seconds.
  4. After dry wiping with Bode X-Wipes, residual colonies were assessed by contact sampling.
Results at the dilution level labelled 10⁴ in the test document
Surface conditionResidual CFU
Before Treatment12
Electropolished220
After SMT Treatment4

Under the procedure described above, the SMT panel had the lowest residual CFU. CFU means colony-forming units and records residual colonies after wiping; it is not a sterilisation rate.

05 / INSTRUMENT REPROCESSING

After 73 cleaning cycles,
the surface remained corrosion-free and smooth.

The SMT instrument reprocessing test documentation records that SMT-treated medical instruments underwent 73 cleaning cycles under conditions comparable to those encountered during sterilisation. The reported result was a corrosion-free, smooth surface.

OBSERVED RESULT AFTER TESTINGCorrosion-free · Smooth surface

73 cycles is the documented observation point, not a failure count or service-life limit. The document does not report failure after the 73rd cycle.

Instrument reconditioning | Surface improvement case

The following before-and-after images are a separate instrument reconditioning case in the same documentation. They are not paired photographs from the 73-cycle test described above.

Before Treatment
Before Treatment
After SMT Treatment
After SMT Treatment
SMT / DIFFERENT PRODUCTS, DIFFERENT REQUIREMENTS

Different processing times.
Finer surface refinement.

SMT processing time is adjusted to component requirements, with attention to internal surface smoothness and consistency within a defined area. Submit a component for sample assessment ↗

SMT / SURFACE REFINEMENT

SMT. A smoother internal surface.

Both images show SMT treatment at different processing times. SMT focuses on maintaining component dimensions while achieving a smoother, more refined surface. Measured Ra surface roughness can reach 0.02 μm (20 nm); see the Ra measurement section on this page. Original magnification, 100 μm scale bars and red arrows are retained.

A|SMT

Internal surface observation at a different SMT processing time.

B|SMT

Internal surface observation at a different SMT processing time.

02 / DEFINED-AREA CONSISTENCY

Surface consistency within a defined area

Ø 12 inch600 mm600 mmOverall component dimensionsSchematic — not to scale

The overall component dimensions are 600 × 600 mm. The internal Ø 12 inch circle is the specified treatment area, within which consistent surface treatment results are required.

SMT / SURFACE & FORM

Refinement.
Across surfaces and details.

Threads, curves and bores. A closer view of SMT surface refinement.

01 / 03

Bores and planes

Surface refinement across planes and bore edges.

02 / 03

Internal and external threads

A closer look at threads and internal surfaces.

03 / 03

Curves and faces

Light reveals the transitions between curved surfaces and faces.

SMT component photographs supplied by KUN-QI.

06 / QUESTIONS IN FOCUS

Understand the data.
Understand the conditions.

Are the image scale bars the same as Ra measurements?

No. The μm scale bars describe the lateral viewing scale. Ra is a measured surface roughness parameter and cannot be calculated directly from these photographs.

Have the micrographs been retouched?

The original embedded images were extracted from the supplied test documents. The source images retain their original framing, colours and scale bars. Public web copies carry a discreet © KUN-QI mark; the technical data have not been altered.

Will my component achieve the same figures?

Material, geometry, initial surface, service environment and acceptance criteria require review. The documented specimens and tests do not establish guaranteed values for every component.

SMT / COMPONENT ENQUIRIES

Start with your component.
Request a Quotation

Send us your component requirements so we can assess the most suitable treatment.

We assess sample and batch enquiries individually. Feasibility, scope, lead time and price are confirmed after review.